|
ARMED FORCES NEWS |
|
Defense undersecretary David Chu has asserted that concurrent receipt ignores the "generous retirement that members earn after 20 years of military service. He added that VA compensation was designed for veterans unable to complete careers due to disability. He also cited a 1996 survey indicating that military retirees with disabilities had the same average income as those without disabilities. He suggested that repeal of REDUX retirement and enactment of Tricare for Life had something to do with concurrent receipt. He also stated that one third of retirees who would gain from concurrent receipt are officers in the top 10 percent of income distribution. Backers of concurrent receipt reply that Chu is simply trying to apply a needs test to earned benefits, and that his claims ignore the fact that the law authorizes service members to be awarded disability compensation and to earn military retirement. |
|
ARMED FORCES NEWS |
|
On Sept. 16, NBC Nightly News with Tom Brokaw presented a special segment on the forfeiture of military retired pay by retirees awarded disability compensation by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Referring to "an obscure 19th Century law," the presentation was billed as "Forgotten Heroes Is Anyone Listening?" Using the term, "broken promises," the segment concluded that wounds are a penalty to full retirement pay. Military retirees are the only retirees from any sector who must forfeit one dollar of their retired pay for each dollar of VA disability compensation awarded. For some, the forfeiture cancels all retired pay earned, thus forcing those retirees to fund their own retirement. A House bill would provide concurrent receipt incrementally to military retirees with VA disability ratings of 60 percent or higher, while a Senate bill would allow full concurrent receipt immediately for all retirees with disability ratings. |
|
ARMED FORCES NEWS |
|
Faced with a flood of more than three million new patients since 1995 and no commensurate funding, VA director Anthony Principi recently declared a stop to marketing for new patients. He now reportedly has decided to change the VA's scheduling methods. The current policy that grants appointments on a first-come-first-served basis would be changed so that priority would go to the most severely disabled veterans. Under this new policy, severely disabled veterans would be given priority when they seek care for either service or non-service-connected care. Moderately disabled veterans would receive priority for service-connected care. Emergency care would not be affected. |
|
ARMED FORCES NEWS |
|
Statistics presented by defense undersecretary David Chu, alleging that the dollar-for-dollar forfeiture of retired pay by military retirees awarded VA disability compensation poses no income hardship for disabled veterans, failed to give the whole story, according to sources. Chu inferred that household income averages didn’t vary substantially between disabled and non-disabled retirees. However, not included in the 1996 survey he quoted were retirees with 100 percent disabilities and retirees with disability ratings so high that every dollar of their retired pay was forfeited. In short, the most seriously disabled, meaning those most likely to earn less in a civilian career, were simply not counted. Furthermore, the sample taken was so small (only 337 of 19,484) that it could be considered statistically insignificant. |
|
VetComm |
|
|
|
|
IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
|
|
|
|
ARMED FORCES NEWS |
|
Word is that Congress hopes to complete the fiscal 2003 defense authorization act without coming back for a lame-duck session. That means it's put-up-or-shut-up time for the overwhelming number of members that have shown support for concurrent receipt. The Military Coalition of more than 30 organizations and individual veterans groups have mounted a fierce campaign to have Congress overturn the century-old law that forces military retirees to forfeit one dollar of retired pay for every dollar of disability compensation awarded by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Several groups have posted Capitol Hill telephone numbers for operators who will connect callers directly to individual lawmaker's offices as well as to the President (whose administration has recommended a veto of any concurrent receipt bill). Examples: 1-202-224-3121, 1-202-224-3121, 1-202-456-1111. In addition, web sites such as http://capwiz.com/troa/home/ have posted ready-made e-mails to send to legislators and the President. |
|
IMMEDIATE RELEASE |
|
|
|
| TO HCVC HOME PAGE |